Navigation

    Logo
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Unread
    • Categories
    • Unreplied
    • Popular
    • GitHub
    • Docu
    • Hilfe
    1. Home
    2. Deutsch
    3. Tester
    4. Tester für WireGuard Adapter gesucht

    NEWS

    • UPDATE 31.10.: Amazon Alexa - ioBroker Skill läuft aus ?

    • Monatsrückblick – September 2025

    • Neues Video "KI im Smart Home" - ioBroker plus n8n

    Tester für WireGuard Adapter gesucht

    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • David G.
      David G. @Shadowhunter23 last edited by

      @shadowhunter23

      Ich hab es auf 30 stehen.
      Bisher keine Nebeneffekte erkannt.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • Grizzelbee
        Grizzelbee Developer @Shadowhunter23 last edited by

        Hallo SchadowHunter,

        @shadowhunter23 sagte in Tester für WireGuard Adapter gesucht:

        Was wäre das kleinste Abfrageintervall was man einstellen kann?

        Der kleinste ist im Grunde 1 Sekunde. Über Sinn und Unsinn eines so kurzen Intervalls kann man sicherlich diskutieren.

        Oder hätte ein kleineres Abfrageintervall irgendwelche Nachteile?

        Ja. Je kleiner der Intervall desto höher die durch die Abfrage ausgelöste Systemlast. Deshalb habe ich 120 Sekunden als default genommen - um auch schwächere Systeme nicht sofort beim ersten Start zu zerlegen. Ich selbst habe bei mir 20 Sekunden eingestellt. Der kürzeste sinnvolle Intervall ist im Grunde die Zeit, die das jeweilige System - unter ca. 75% Last - benötigt um die Anfrage komplett zu verarbeiten - plus (mindestens) eine Sekunde. Sonst überlappen sich die Abfragen.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • Negalein
          Negalein Global Moderator last edited by

          @Grizzelbee

          mit 1.6.2 kommen haufenweise dieser Meldungen.

          Node.js: v18.19.0
          NPM: 10.2.3
          Admin: 6.15.2
          JS-Controller: 5.0.17

          2024-03-26 18:14:22.366  - warn: wireguard.0 (1754650) Setting Nega-wg0.peers.PBQtaueqfB/GxwU6AElLQWXiRRlIPtBofbK1By9oBFY=.connected to false is senseless. Please open an issue on github and provide a debug log sowing the occurrence of this issue.
          2024-03-26 18:14:22.366  - warn: wireguard.0 (1754650) Setting Nega-wg0.users to null is senseless. Please open an issue on github and provide a debug log sowing the occurrence of this issue.
          

          Issue hab ich erstellt.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • David G.
            David G. last edited by

            Hat es von euch schonmal jemand geschafft, auf die wireguard Daten einer Fritzbox zu kommen?

            Grizzelbee 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Grizzelbee
              Grizzelbee Developer @David G. last edited by

              @david-g sagte in Tester für WireGuard Adapter gesucht:

              Hat es von euch schonmal jemand geschafft, auf die wireguard Daten einer Fritzbox zu kommen?

              Ich befürchte dass du die Frage falsch gestellt hast 😉 - ich denke sie müsste lauten ob es schon ein jemand versucht hat an die Daten zu kommen.
              Ich für meinen Teil kann sagen dass ich schon einmal darüber nachgedacht habe - mehr aber auch nicht.
              Das wäre schon eine Menge Aufwand das nur zu versuchen und das bei völlig ungewissem Ausgang der Aktion. Deshalb scheue ich den Aufwand.
              Wenn jemand klar sagen könnte ob u d wie man an die Daten kommt, würde ich es einbauen - aber für Forschung fehlen mir aktuell die Zeit und die Nerven.

              Liebe Grüße
              Grizzelbee

              David G. Negalein 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • David G.
                David G. @Grizzelbee last edited by

                @grizzelbee

                Ich hab zwar so keine Ahnung vom Thema, aber ich google das heute abend mal ^^.

                Ich selber habe wireguard im LCX (hatte überlegt zu wechseln), denke aber es werden immer mehr Leute die es in einer Fritte haben.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Negalein
                  Negalein Global Moderator @Grizzelbee last edited by

                  @grizzelbee

                  Hallo

                  Ich hab in WG einen neuen Client hinzugefügt.
                  Dieser wird mir in ioB nicht angezeigt.

                  2025-07-14 07:58:20.560 - info: host.ioBroker instance system.adapter.wireguard.0 in version "1.8.0" started with pid 78643
                  2025-07-14 07:58:21.459 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Redis Objects: Use Redis connection: 0.0.0.0:9001
                  2025-07-14 07:58:21.514 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Objects client ready ... initialize now
                  2025-07-14 07:58:21.519 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Objects create System PubSub Client
                  2025-07-14 07:58:21.520 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Objects create User PubSub Client
                  2025-07-14 07:58:21.684 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Objects client initialize lua scripts
                  2025-07-14 07:58:21.690 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Objects connected to redis: 0.0.0.0:9001
                  2025-07-14 07:58:21.759 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Redis States: Use Redis connection: 0.0.0.0:9000
                  2025-07-14 07:58:21.803 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) States create System PubSub Client
                  2025-07-14 07:58:21.804 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) States create User PubSub Client
                  2025-07-14 07:58:21.896 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) States connected to redis: 0.0.0.0:9000
                  2025-07-14 07:58:21.972 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Plugin sentry Initialize Plugin (enabled=true)
                  2025-07-14 07:58:22.277 - info: wireguard.0 (78643) starting. Version 1.8.0 in /opt/iobroker/node_modules/iobroker.wireguard, node: v20.19.1, js-controller: 7.0.7
                  2025-07-14 07:58:22.377 - info: wireguard.0 (78643) There is 1 wireguard host to monitor.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:22.426 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) _knownInterfaces={"Nega-wg0":{"id":"wireguard.0.Nega-wg0","online":false}}
                  2025-07-14 07:58:22.426 - info: wireguard.0 (78643) Started 30 seconds monitoring interval for host [Nega]
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.426 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Retrieving WireGuard status of host [Nega] on address [10.0.1.204]
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.427 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Trying to reach host 10.0.1.204.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.427 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Connecting to host: [10.0.1.204] on port 22
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.480 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) ssh client :: authenticated
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.480 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Executing command [sudo wg show all dump] on host 10.0.1.204.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.646 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Stream :: close
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.647 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) received rawdata: wg0 xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx 51820 off
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.648 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Workdata: [["wg0","xxxxxxxxxx/hdWQ=","xxxxxxxxxx","51820","off"],["wg0","xxxxxxxxxx","xxxxxxxxxx","(none)","10.252.1.1/32","0","0","0","off"],["wg0","xxxxxxxxxx","xxxxxxxxxx","(none)","10.252.1.2/32","0","0","0","off"],["wg0","xxxxxxxxxx","xxxxxxxxxx","(none)","10.252.1.5/32","0","0","0","off"],["wg0","xxxxxxxxxx","xxxxxxxxxx","(none)","10.252.1.6/32","0","0","0","off"],["wg0","xxxxxxxxxx","xxxxxxxxxx","100.65.12.60:55038","10.252.1.7/32","1752472647","132884","28060","off"],["wg0","xxxxxxxxxx","xxxxxxxxxx","185.129.173.57:60979","10.252.1.3/32","1752472662","210016","1609792","off"],[""]]
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.648 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) New Interface: wg0. Initialize object.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.649 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Host: Nega has 1 wireguard interface(s).
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.649 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) baseId: Nega-wg0
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.650 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) setAllKnownInterfacesOnlineState: _knownInterfaces: {"Nega-wg0":{"id":"wireguard.0.Nega-wg0","online":true}}
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.651 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.peers to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.651 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.651 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.peers.xxxxxxxxxx to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.651 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.651 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.peers.xxxxxxxxxx.allowedIps to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.651 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.652 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.peers.xxxxxxxxxx to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.652 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.652 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.peers.xxxxxxxxxx.allowedIps to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.652 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.652 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.peers.xxxxxxxxxx to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.652 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.653 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.peers.xxxxxxxxxx.allowedIps to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.653 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.653 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.peers.xxxxxxxxxx to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.653 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.653 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.peers.xxxxxxxxxx.allowedIps to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.653 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.653 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.peers.xxxxxxxxxx to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.653 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.654 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.peers.xxxxxxxxxx.allowedIps to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.654 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.654 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.peers.YpcvgzbUTpuE5fptixxxxxxxxxx to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.654 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.654 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.peers.YpcvgzbUTpuE5fptixxxxxxxxxx.allowedIps to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.654 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.654 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.users to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.654 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.654 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.users.Nega to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.654 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.654 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.users.Max to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.654 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.654 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.users.Margret to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.655 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.655 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.users.Dina to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.655 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.655 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.users.Kloane to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.655 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.655 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.users.Mario to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.655 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.672 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Error while getObject: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'common')
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.673 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Error while getObject: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'common')
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.674 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Error while getObject: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'common')
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.675 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Error while getObject: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'common')
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.675 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Error while getObject: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'common')
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.675 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Error while getObject: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'common')
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.676 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Error while getObject: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'common')
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.676 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Error while getObject: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'common')
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.676 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Error while getObject: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'common')
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.677 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Error while getObject: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'common')
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.677 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Error while getObject: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'common')
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.677 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Error while getObject: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'common')
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.677 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Error while getObject: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'common')
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.677 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Error while getObject: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'common')
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.677 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Error while getObject: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'common')
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.677 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Error while getObject: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'common')
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.677 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Error while getObject: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'common')
                  

                  Es geht um diesen Client

                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.654 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.peers.YpcvgzbUTpuE5fptixxxxxxxxxx to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.654 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.654 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.peers.YpcvgzbUTpuE5fptixxxxxxxxxx.allowedIps to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.654 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on 
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.655 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) Setting Nega-wg0.users.Mario to null is senseless.
                  2025-07-14 07:58:52.655 - debug: wireguard.0 (78643) This usually only happens when you misconfigure this adapter. Please read the documentation on GitHub and fix your config.
                  

                  72dc3ae3-e52b-4cf4-836f-eb898443a316-image.png

                  04431635-a416-4fa2-9214-a02416b8ca7e-image.png

                  d9905ace-4b67-4937-92f5-d39e5af221bd-image.png

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Negalein
                    Negalein Global Moderator @Grizzelbee last edited by Negalein

                    @grizzelbee

                    zum Test hab ich mal alle Objekte gelöscht und Adapter neu gestartet.
                    Jetzt kommen keine Objekte mehr.

                    objects-ioBroker-07-16-2025_09_43_AM.png


                    PS: mit 1.7.0 ist wieder alles da.
                    Ausser den Namen in den Objekten.

                    d29a4f45-baef-4035-b09d-462220e6ce7b-image.png

                    Negalein 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Negalein
                      Negalein Global Moderator @Negalein last edited by

                      @negalein sagte in Tester für WireGuard Adapter gesucht:

                      @grizzelbee

                      zum Test hab ich mal alle Objekte gelöscht und Adapter neu gestartet.
                      Jetzt kommen keine Objekte mehr.

                      objects-ioBroker-07-16-2025_09_43_AM.png


                      PS: mit 1.7.0 ist wieder alles da.
                      Ausser den Namen in den Objekten.

                      d29a4f45-baef-4035-b09d-462220e6ce7b-image.png

                      @Grizzelbee

                      kannst du zu dem Problem mit 1.8.0 schon was sagen?
                      Issue besteht schon länger.

                      Grizzelbee 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Grizzelbee
                        Grizzelbee Developer @Negalein last edited by

                        @negalein

                        Leider kann ich da noch nichts zu sagen - obwohl der Issue schon länger besteht.
                        Tatsache ist zu einen, das ich aktuell leider nicht die Produktivität habe, die ich gerne hätte und zum anderen sehr intensiv mit dem MieleCloudService beschäftigt bin. Oder anders ausgedrückt: Der MCS beansprucht gerade meine gesamte (gesundheitlich bedingt nicht besonders große) Aufmerksamkeit.

                        Ich kann dich im Moment nur um zwei Dingen bitten:

                        • Geduld
                        • Falls noch nicht geschehen, einen github Issue anlegen, damit das nicht in Vergessenheit gerät.

                        Tut mir leid, das ich keine besseren Nachrichten habe.

                        Hast Du schon mal probiert mehrere Versionen zurück zu gehen und zu schauen ob eine alte Version wie gewünscht und erwartet läuft? Vielleicht auch die Objekte durch eine alte Version anlegen lassen und dann ein Update drüber spielen.

                        Mehr fällt mir dazu leider gerade nicht ein. Tut mir leid.

                        Grizzelbee

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post

                        Support us

                        ioBroker
                        Community Adapters
                        Donate

                        467
                        Online

                        32.4k
                        Users

                        81.3k
                        Topics

                        1.3m
                        Posts

                        12
                        118
                        15812
                        Loading More Posts
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        Community
                        Impressum | Datenschutz-Bestimmungen | Nutzungsbedingungen
                        The ioBroker Community 2014-2023
                        logo